{"id":24089,"date":"2023-11-21T23:01:00","date_gmt":"2023-11-21T23:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jb365-vip.com\/?p=24089"},"modified":"2023-11-22T00:05:32","modified_gmt":"2023-11-22T00:05:32","slug":"revisions-to-standardising-test-batting-averages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jb365-vip.com\/revisions-to-standardising-test-batting-averages\/","title":{"rendered":"REVISIONS TO STANDARDISING TEST BATTING AVERAGES"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

I\u2019m very pleased to say there were some twenty responses to my article about standardising Test batting averages (CW, 29 October), many of which have been valuable in indicating avenues for improvement on the initial exercise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This material summarises concerns expressed in the Forum posts and, in light of these, outlines revisions made to the approach adopted and resulting changes to the ranking of players.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have made two sets of revisions: one to reflect my own current thinking, and then I\u2019ve combined these with additional revisions which produces results that I think participants may in general prefer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Concerns and What\u2019s Been Done<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Three main concerns were expressed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n